Here is an interesting development. According to the website:

"...the deepest purpose of the Manifesto is a serious call to reform—an urgent challenge to reaffirm Evangelical identity, to reform Evangelical behavior, to reposition Evangelicals in public life, and so rededicate ourselves to the high calling of being Evangelical followers of Jesus Christ."

The manifesto is a serious self-assessment of evangelicals.  I have only skimmed it at the moment. There are some very interesting points that certainly resonate with me and others that make me say, hmmmm.

Regarding Reaffirming Our Identity, the manifesto states:

"Our first task is to reaffirm who we are. Evangelicals are Christians who define themselves, their faith, and their lives according to the Good News of Jesus of Nazareth. ... Believing that the Gospel of Jesus is God’s good news for the whole world, we affirm with the Apostle Paul that we are ―not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation. Contrary to widespread misunderstanding today, we Evangelicals should be  defined theologically, and not politically, socially, or culturally."

On Reforming Our Own Behavior:

"...to be Evangelical or to carry the name Evangelicals is not only to shape our faith and our lives according to the teaching and standards of the Way of Jesus, but to need to do so again and again. But if the Evangelical impulse is a radical, reforming, and innovative force, we acknowledge with sorrow a momentous irony today. We who time and again have stood for the renewal of tired forms, for the revival of dead churches, for the warming of cold hearts, for the reformation of corrupt practices and heretical beliefs, and for the reform of gross injustices in society, are ourselves in dire need of reformation and renewal today. Reformers, we ourselves need to be reformed. Protestants, we are the ones against whom protest must be made."

On Rethinking Our Place in Public Life:

"We affirm that to be Evangelical and to carry the name of Christ is to seek to be faithful to the freedom, justice, peace, and well-being that are at the heart of the kingdom of God, to bring these gifts into public life as a service to all, and to work with all who share these ideals and care for the common good. Citizens of the City of God, we are resident aliens in the Earthly City. Called by Jesus to be ―in the world but ―not of the world, we are fully engaged in public affairs, but never completely equated with any party, partisan ideology, economic system, class, tribe, or national identity."

It will be interesting to see where this goes.

I'm posting the link here to gather others' thoughts. I'll follow up after a more thorough read.

Please comments welcome:

click image below to read about it:

EvangelicalManifesto.com

Add your comment to this post.

Christianity | Culture

Receive posts to this blog via email by  subscribing here.

Comments

5/11/2008 3:19:36 AM #

After a careful reading of it, as well as joining the live webcast on its inauguration, I believe this is a much needed corrective for the Church on all fronts. I hope and pray members of the Body are listening.

Paul

5/11/2008 7:25:45 PM #

I've read it through once. I agree that there are corrective statements that need to be considered (as there always are).  I was surprised that the manifesto and the supporting documents were devoid of any scriptural backing whatsoever.

I am not saying that the points made have no scriptural basis. It's good to see that the authors have indicated so.

If we are to be corrected, it should be based on none other than the Word of God should it not? (2 Tim 3:16-17).

Xavier Pacheco

5/12/2008 12:26:29 AM #

Hum....
If the points made in the Manifesto have a "scriptural basis" as you intimate, then they're not entirely devoid of any scriptural backing whatsoever, right? Put differently, if someone comes to me and claims "You've not been loving your wife sacrificially and you really should start doing so," it would carry weight because it's backed by Scripture (Eph. 5:25 comes to mind). Likewise, although the Manifesto may not have used a quote from Scripture, it still carries authoritative weight since it is based on Scripture.

I'm reminded of J. P. Moreland's seminal paper he read at the last Evangelical Theological Society's annual meeting that caused not a few concerns entitled "How Evangelicals Became Over-Committed to the Bible and What can be Done about It." Highly recommended
kingdomtriangle.blogspot.com/.../...committed.html">How Evangelicals Became Over Committed... One may not agree on every point of Moreland's paper, but his main point is worthy of consideration.

Just thinking...

Paul

5/12/2008 8:34:43 PM #

Those are good points Paul. I also understand that this document is not written to specifically Evangelicals only.  It is written to the general public.

As for their study. I would expect that this bring out the  scriptures upon which the document is based. Consider the topic of political activism for instance. We must ask, what is the biblical mandate for political reform?

Just thinking too...

-- x

Xavier Pacheco

5/13/2008 7:59:36 AM #

"What is the biblical mandate for political reform?"
Well, now, THAT'S a very good question. There are plenty of passages in Scripture that could have gone in that direction but did not (Mark 12:13-17; Rom. 13:1-7 come to mind). But of course first-century believers did not live in a democracy where political action was possible.

Paul

5/13/2008 6:27:44 PM #

See this response from http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=1147">Albert Mohler.

Xavier Pacheco

5/16/2008 6:37:15 AM #

X and Paul,

I appreciate your exchange Brothers.  I thoroughly enjoyed reading through the Manifesto and thought it to be a trumpet call, reveille if you will, to all of us who bear the name of Christ.  As to the issue of scripture references in the document, I agree with you both.  While scripture quotations or references don't make our point scriptural, the content of our statement determines that, I would have really appreciated the references, if not the full quotes, in the document.  Perhaps that's a good suggestion we can throw their way?

Servant of the King,
Jim

PS... I haven't read Al's response yet.

Jim Adams

5/16/2008 7:20:03 AM #

Thanks for the feedback Jim!  I appreciate you comments.

Xavier Pacheco

5/16/2008 7:33:34 PM #

Thanks, Jim. It certainly would do no harm by adding Scripture references, eh? Nevertheless, as you say, having them does not make a statement "scriptural;" rather it's the content.

Cheers!

Paul

Add comment




  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading